Mason Archival Repository Service

Neural Signatures of Trust in Reciprocity

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Krueger, Frank
dc.contributor.author Chernyak, Sergey V
dc.creator Chernyak, Sergey V
dc.date.accessioned 2016-09-28T10:23:07Z
dc.date.available 2016-09-28T10:23:07Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/1920/10465
dc.description.abstract Trust facilitates conditions for safe sharing of valued resources – a social setting vital to success in a wide range of socio-technological networks. With an increasing reliance of economic initiatives on trust-assured interactions, the need to inquire into the mental processes of trust has emerged. This led to a proliferation of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies focusing on domain-specific measures. However, inherent metric deficits of fMRI have resulted in discrete outcomes highlighting further need for constructing a comprehensive neurocognitive model of trust. Here, a domain-general methodology aims at overcoming the negative tendencies in prior fMRI studies by applying a series of coordinate-based “Activation Likelihood Estimation” (ALE) meta-analyses of the fMRI data and a data-driven Multivariate Granger Causality (MVGC) connectivity analysis of hyperscan-fMRI data – an approach not undertaken in trust studies prior to this dissertation. To determine the effects on behavior of cross-study variability in brain activation during a trust-inducing investment game (IG) task, the meta-analysis aims at revealing the extent of neurocognitive differentiation during trust, learning to trust and reciprocity. One-shot IG, implicating unconditional trust, is compared to multi-round IG implicating the conditional trust. In the MVGC study, the neurocognitive differences in the effective connectivity of interpersonal (“brain-to-brain”) trust are discerned. Meta-analysis revealed a strong differential response between unconditional trust (ambiguity, insula) and conditional trust (reward, ventral striatum). Learning to trust engaged a goal-guided (rostrolateral PFC) transition between decision-making (dorsal striatum, action-valuation) and feedback processing (ventral striatum, reward reinforcement). Reciprocating trust was linked to insula-mediated norm-compliance tendency to avoid breaking trust. For the effective connectivity analysis, a steady increase in trust and reciprocity engaged a mentalizing network as evidenced in the observed dorsal PFC connectivity with the parietal cortex. Within-trustor, dorsomedial (dmPFC) bidirectional connectivity with posterior cingulate cortex was key to guiding trust-valued choices (hypothalamus). Within-trustee, the key motive of norm-compliance – trustworthiness (lateral orbitofrontal cortex) was mediated by dorsomedial and dorsolateral PFC in Stage 1 and by precuneus in Stage 2. For the brain-to-brain exchange, the trustor’s dmPFC was most active, but the trustee’s dmPFC was virtually absent indicating dissociable patterns of other-regarding preferences for the trustor and trustee. Collectively, this dissertation lends evidence consistent with the putative socio-cognitive, economic-utility and reinforcement-learning models of trust and opens new perspectives by applying an effective domain-general data-driven dynamic approach.
dc.format.extent 134 pages
dc.language.iso en
dc.rights Copyright 2016 Sergey V Chernyak
dc.subject Neurosciences en_US
dc.subject Economics en_US
dc.subject Ethics en_US
dc.subject Activation Likelihood Estimation en_US
dc.subject Effective Connectivity en_US
dc.subject Granger Causality en_US
dc.subject Hyperscan-fMRI en_US
dc.subject Investment Game en_US
dc.subject Trust en_US
dc.title Neural Signatures of Trust in Reciprocity
dc.type Dissertation
thesis.degree.level Ph.D.
thesis.degree.discipline Neuroscience
thesis.degree.grantor George Mason University


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search MARS


Browse

My Account

Statistics