Abstract:
Researchers and practitioners in the field of conflict analysis and resolution have realized
the significant role that the news media can play in avoiding, containing or resolving
conflicts. Yet there are scant guidelines on how to take full advantage of the news
media’s role in conflict-affected societies. Empirical research on the topic of media and
peacebuilding has focused on ways of altering journalistic practices to advance fairer and
more accurate journalism in reporting war and peace. However, the literature stops short
of providing an account of limitations that journalists face in their endeavor to advance
peacebuilding. Additionally, the existing research does not fully elaborate on how
journalists understand their positions in a conflict-torn society. To address this gap the
research asks: “What are the opportunities in which media can contribute to
peacebuilding in conflict-affected societies? And, furthermore, how can journalists
reconsider their positions in conflict situations in order to advance peacebuilding?”
This research studies the case of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and addresses the
above research questions by analyzing journalists’ understandings of their “positions”
(identified as a cluster of rights and duties) vis-à-vis their “role” in conflict situations. In
addition, it explores the obstacles that limit their abilities to support peacebuilding.
Through this approach the study defines a practical framework termed as “peacebuilding
journalism”, which is informed by the journalists’ limitations and understandings of their
positions in conflict-affected societies.
The study identifies two clusters of external and internal factors that limit the
journalists’ capacity to advance peacebuilding and which lead the journalists to an act of
self-positioning to appear loyal to the national cause and to gain their groups’ trust.
Additionally, the research finds that journalists are more prone to cooperate in the efforts
of peacebuilding by emphasizing their rights and duties (positions) as members of the
society. The significant contribution of this study is the defined, practical concept of
peacebuilding journalism, which combines conflict resolution and journalism practices to
help advance a positive news media role during active conflict. The framework first
synthesizes three components to address the journalists’ limitations. These are: (i)
coverage of the other side, (ii) alternative media coverage, and (iii) creative reporting.
The concepts also puts forward three instruments of peacebuilding journalism to guide
the journalists in identifying stories and content that support peace between conflict
parties. These are: (i) conflict mapping for journalists, (ii) an early warning system, and
(iii) cross-border cooperation to facilitate exchange of news and information.
